Политика националне безбедности 1/2025

THE NEXUS BETWEEN HYBRID WARFARE AND CONTEMPORARY TERRORISM

Authors
UDCУДК: 355.358.014:327.88::323.28 Pages167-190 Year2025
Download PDF 10.5937/pnb28-57340
Research overview

Abstract

The paper’s topic is to examine the depth of the connection between terrorism and hybrid warfare. Regardless of the current disagreements among theorists as to whether ‘hybrid war’ is a modern form of warfare or an ‘old phenomenon in a new guise,’ the fact is that this phenomenon involves the application of various elements and components of hard and soft power, through various non-violent and violent content, which certainly includes terrorism, to destabilize the legal order, cultural and value foundations of the attacked state and society. Considering that previous research has considered terrorism only at the level of actors in hybrid warfare and taking into account the complexity of the effects that terrorist activity has on the state and society to which it is applied, there is a need for a deeper examination of the place and role of this form of political violence in hybrid warfare. In this regard, the research question of this article relates to the connection between these two phenomena, not only considering the actors but also the dimensions and phases of the conduct of hybrid warfare. Hybrid warfare seeks out a state’s weaknesses in the political, military, economic, social, infrastructure, information, and other domains and conducts activities within these dimensions using appropriate actors and tools. Terrorism, due to its complex nature and wide-ranging effects, is a suitable activity carried out by the state. Non-state actors of hybrid warfare, applying it with an adequate degree of escalation in the phases of preparation, destabilization, and coercion as the final phase, attacking critical infrastructure and other facilities with which they threaten the national economy, carrying out operations as proxy forces, exploiting socio-cultural divisions in societies, inserting themselves into migrant flows, placing and spreading specific messages and proclamations in the media, the effects of which spill over into various spheres of the attacked state. Through which forms of manifestation and through which dimensions of conducting hybrid warfare terrorism will be applied will depend on a multitude of different circumstances. It is important to emphasize that this phenomenon cannot be considered hybrid warfare without synchronization with other hybrid content, primarily psychological propaganda, information actions, and economic and political pressures. Only in synchronization with other hybrid content does terrorism achieve its goal, which is reflected in the weakening of defense capacities, the financial exhaustion of the country, and the creation of a social crisis in society, i.e., as part of preparatory operations for upcoming armed operations of a conventional nature. Ultimately, it can be concluded that there is a deeper connection between these two phenomena, not only through the well-known position that terrorist organizations can be one of the actors of hybrid warfare and that there is a possibility of common goals with other actors, but that a more profound connection is achieved through numerous dimensions and phases of conducting hybrid warfare

Sources and literature

References

  1. Beriša, Hatidža. 2014. Кoncept Velike Albanije kao pretnja nacionalnoj bezbednosti Republike Srbije. Beograd: Zadužbina Andrejević.
  2. Bilal, Arsalan. 2021. “Hybrid Warfare–New Threats, Complexity, and ‘Trust’ as the Antidote.” NATO Review. November 30, 2021. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2021/11/30/hybrid-warfare-new-threats-complexity-and-trust-as-the-antidote/index.html.
  3. Bjelajac, Mile. 2019. “Prikrivanje i razotkrivanje pravih razloga za rat 1999. na Кosovu i Metohiji.” Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 16 (1): 13–36. DOI: 10.22182/pnb.1612019.1.
  4. Chernoperov, Lvovich Vasily, and Umus Ildyrymovna Suleimanova. 2021. “Hybrid war: prerequisites for emergence, concepts, essence of the goal, tools, legal issues, risks.” Noospheric studies 3: 33–46.
  5. Coady, C. A. J. 2021. The Meaning of Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Cvetković, Nenad, i Mitar Кovač. 2019. „Pojam hibridnog rata.” Vojno delo 71 (7): 323–343. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo1907323C.
  7. Đorđević, Branislav, ur. 2015. Savremeni terorizam. Beograd: Službeni glasnik i Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu.
  8. Đorić, Marija, Кristina Brajović Car, i Aleksnadra Marković. 2020. Nasilni ekstremizam: multidisciplinarni pristup. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
  9. Đorić, Marija. 2021. Ekstremizam i nova realnost: Svet u doba koronavirusa. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
    European Commission [EC]. 2020. “EU Security Union Strategy: connecting the dots in a new security ecosystem.” European Commission. July 24, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1379.
  10. Кlauzevic, Кarl. 1951. O ratu. Beograd: Grafičko preduzeće „Vuk Кaradžić”.
  11. Gerasimov, Valery. “The Value of Science is in the Foresight.” Military-Industrial Kurier. February 26, 2013. https://www.vpk-news.ru/articles/14632.
  12. Giannopoulos, Georgios, Hanna Smith, and Marianthi Theocharidou. 2020. The Landscape of Hybrid Threats: A conceptual model. Helsinki: European Commision, Hybrid CoE.
  13. Hoffman, Frank. 2010. “Hybrid Threats: Neither Omnipotent nor Unbeatable.” Orbis 54 (3): 441–455. DOI: 10.1016/J.ORBIS.2010.04.009.
  14. Israeli, Raphael, and Ana Dimitrovska. 2021. Political, Social and Religious Studies of the Balkans – Volume II – Radical Islam in the Western
  15. Balkans. Durham: Strategic Book Publishing & Rights Agency.
  16. Krstić, Marko. 2017. „Tajne akcije – 'alternativni pravci' delovanja obaveštajnih službi.” Vojno delo 69 (3): 119–133. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo1703119K.
  17. Lazarević, Vladimir. 2020. Heroizam i čovečnost pripadnika Treće armije i Prištinskog korpusa u odbrani zemlje od NATO agresije.” U Odbrana od NATO agresije – 20 godina posle, ur. Jovanka Šaranović i Snežana Đokić, 21–33. Beograd: Univerzitet odbrane, Medija centar „Odbrana”.
  18. Mattis, James, and Frank Hoffman. 2005. “Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars.” U.S. Naval Institute. Last accessed February 10, 2025. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2005/november/future-warfare-rise-hybrid-wars.
  19. Mijalković, Saša, i Mladen Bajagić. 2012.
  20. Organizovani kriminal i terorizam. Beograd: Кriminalističko-policijska akademija.
  21. Mijalković, Saša, Mladen Bajagić, i Marija Popović Mančević. 2023. Organizovani kriminal i terorizam. Beograd: Кriminalističko-policijski univerzitet.
  22. Monaghan, Sean, Patrick Cullen, and Njord Wegge. 2019. “Countering Hybrid Warfare Project: Countering Hybrid Warfare.” Multinational Capability Development Campaign. Last accessed February 10, 2025. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c8141e2e5274a2a51ac0b34/concepts_mcdc_countering_hybrid_warfare.pdf.
  23. Milošević, Davor. 2018. „Hibridni rat – Posledica Hladnog rata.” U Hibridno ratovanje – Dilema koncepta savremenih sukoba, ur. Nebojša Nikolić, 63–76. Beograd: Institut za strategijska istraživanja.
  24. Miljković, Milan. 2008. „Savremene psihološke operacije oružanih snaga.” Vojno delo 60 (3): 98–121.
  25. Mitrović, Miroslav, i Nebojša Nikolić. 2022. Hibridni rat. Beograd: Medija centar „Odbrana”.
  26. Nemeth, William. 2002. “Future War and Chechnya: A Case for Hybrid Warfare.” MA Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School. U.S.
  27. Nikolić, Nebojša. 2017. „Neograničeni rat - Кineska percepcija savremenog ratovanja.” Vojno delo 69 (6): 293–303. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo1706293N.
  28. O’Rourke, Ronald. 2016. “A Shift in the International Security Environment: Potential Implications for Defense–Issues for US Congress.” Congressional Research Service. June 8, 2016. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20181024_R43838_fd72c9a2f744419b3ff915ddc881ed7ce74caddf.pdf.
  29. Putnam, D. Robert. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.
  30. Simeunović, Dragan. 2002. Teorija politike, rider, I deo. Beograd: Udruženje „Nauka i društvo”.
  31. Schroefl, Josef., Stuart J. Kaufman. 2014. “Hybrid Actors, Tactical Variety: Rethinking Asymmetric and Hybrid War.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 37 (10): 862–880. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2014.941 435.
  32. Stajić, Ljubomir, i Vladan M. Mirković. 2021. „Nova uloga terorizma danas.” U Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, ur. Slobodan Orlović, 395–413. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
From the same issue

Related publications